The Situation

The company operated a marketplace connecting organizations with domain experts for consulting engagements. Think of it as Gerson Lehrman or AlphaSights, but with a focus on specialized knowledge areas including federal government expertise.

Two-sided marketplaces have a chicken-and-egg problem. Buyers won't come if there aren't enough experts. Experts won't sign up if there aren't enough paying engagements. You have to build both sides simultaneously—and the acquisition cost for both can kill you before you reach critical mass.

When I joined, the government vertical was a hypothesis. The existing motion was:

CAC was high on both sides. Close rates were low. The thesis was promising but the execution was generic.

My job was to build a repeatable acquisition engine for both sides of the marketplace, specifically targeting the government sector.

The Insight

Government contracting is a public business. Unlike commercial B2B where everything happens behind closed doors, federal procurement generates massive amounts of public data:

Demand signals are visible:

Supply signals are also visible:

The insight: We could build targeting criteria from public data that commercial intelligence tools couldn't match.

The second insight was about timing. Government contractors need experts at specific moments: proposal phase, post-award staffing, recompete preparation. Catching contractors at the right moment was as important as reaching them at all.

The System

Layer 1: Demand-Side Intelligence (Government Contractors)

Data Sources and Signal Extraction

SAM.gov (System for Award Management) - Company registration, past contract history, certifications, NAICS codes.

USAspending.gov - Where money is flowing, incumbent contractors, contract vehicles, upcoming recompetes.

FPDS (Federal Procurement Data System) - All contract actions, set-aside designations, prime/sub relationships.

Building the Target Account List

CONTRACTOR SCORE = f(
  Activity Score (recent wins, active proposals)
  + Growth Score (contract value trajectory)
  + Fit Score (target agency alignment, domain match)
  + Intent Score (hiring patterns, teaming announcements)
  + Accessibility Score (company size, likely to buy services)
)

Outreach Triggers

Trigger EventSignal SourceOutreach Message
New RFP in their domainSAM.gov posting"Building your team for [opportunity]?"
Contract award winFPDS/USAspending"Congrats on [contract]—need experts to staff?"
Lost bidAward to competitor"Strengthen your next proposal with [expertise]"
Recompete approachingContract end date"Defending [contract]? We can help."

Layer 2: Supply-Side Intelligence (Former Federal Executives)

LinkedIn Sales Navigator Sourcing

SEARCH CRITERIA:
  Past employer contains:
    - "Department of Defense" OR "DOD"
    - "Department of Energy" OR "DOE"
    - "USAID" OR "Agency for International Development"

  AND Title (past or present) contains:
    - "Program Manager" OR "Director" OR "Chief"
    - "Contracting Officer" OR "COR"
    - "Senior Advisor" OR "Deputy"

  AND Current status:
    - Not currently employed by federal government
    - OR "Consultant" OR "Advisor" (indicates availability)

Experience Verification

LinkedIn profiles told part of the story. We cross-referenced with FPDS/USAspending (contracting officer records), GAO reports (program managers named), congressional testimony archives, and professional associations (NCMA, AFCEA).

Layer 3: Two-Sided Matching

The matching logic connected contractor needs with expert supply:

CONTRACTOR NEED                    EXPERT MATCH
───────────────────────────────    ────────────────────────────
DOD cyber contract proposal    →   Ex-DOD cyber program manager
  Agency: DOD                        Agency: DOD
  Domain: Cybersecurity              Domain: Cybersecurity
  Need: Proposal support             Capability: Acquisition knowledge
  Timeline: 60 days                  Availability: Immediate

Value Proposition by Side

To Contractors: Access to experts who understand the agency from inside. Faster proposal development. Better win rates. Flexible engagement.

To Experts: Monetize institutional knowledge without full-time commitment. Stay engaged in the field post-government. Flexible work.

The Takeaway

Two-sided marketplaces are hard because you have to build two acquisition engines simultaneously. The government sector offered a unique advantage: visibility.

1. Public data is underutilized. SAM.gov, USAspending, FPDS, LinkedIn—all public, all rich with signal. The work is in connecting the dots, not in accessing proprietary databases.
2. Timing beats targeting. Reaching the right company is necessary but not sufficient. Reaching them at the right moment—when they're actively pursuing an opportunity—transforms response rates.
3. Two-sided attribution requires two-sided thinking. Every contractor win was only possible because we had the right expert. Every expert engagement was only possible because we had the right contractor. Attribution that credits only one side misses the point.